AI governance guidance
AI policy vs AI governance
An AI policy gives people clear rules for using AI at work. AI governance is the wider set of decisions, roles and controls that help those rules stay useful as AI use grows.
AI governance guidance
An AI policy gives people clear rules for using AI at work. AI governance is the wider set of decisions, roles and controls that help those rules stay useful as AI use grows.
An AI policy is a practical document. It tells staff which AI tools they may use, what information must stay protected, when human review is required and who to ask when something is unclear.
AI governance is the operating model behind those rules. It covers ownership, approved tools, risk decisions, training, review, monitoring, exceptions and how the organisation keeps AI use aligned with its responsibilities.
A good AI usage policy turns a broad topic into everyday guidance. It should help people make sensible decisions without needing to become specialists in data protection, information security or AI regulation.
Governance is the continuing management of AI use. It helps the organisation decide which tools are acceptable, which uses need approval, what risks need review and how staff should be supported.
Who is responsible for AI policy, approved tools, exceptions, incidents and review?
Which AI uses are low risk, which need checks and which are not appropriate?
What do staff and managers need to know before AI becomes part of daily work?
How will the organisation check that AI use remains safe, accurate and useful?
The policy is often the first useful output because it gives staff something clear to follow. Governance then keeps that policy alive by reviewing tools, learning from incidents, updating training and making decisions about new use cases.
For example, a policy may say staff must only use approved AI tools for customer information. Governance decides which tools are approved, how that decision is made, who reviews new tools and what evidence is needed before a tool is added to the list.
Can staff paste customer emails into an AI tool to draft a reply?
Which tool, data protection checks, access controls and review steps make that use acceptable?
Only use approved tools and do not enter personal or confidential data into public AI systems.
Maintain an approved tools list, define permitted data types and review higher-risk use cases.
A policy may be enough as a starting point, especially for smaller teams. You probably need broader governance when AI is being used with sensitive data, client work, regulated activity, high-impact decisions or integrated business systems.
FAQ
It can be enough as a first step. As AI use grows, the organisation should also define ownership, approved tools, training, risk review and monitoring.
Not always. Small organisations can keep governance simple: a named owner, approved tools list, practical policy, review dates and clear routes for questions.
Start by creating a practical AI policy, then use it to identify decisions about approved tools, personal data, staff training and higher-risk AI use.